Darryl Neher – Democrat for District 5

Primary winner

1)      What do you think is the most important change Bloomington can make over the coming decade?  Why?

The merger of Bloomington Transit and IU Bus Service is the most important change our community can make regarding public transportation.

Why?  Currently, Bloomington ranks 2nd behind Indianapolis in total number of rides per year – yet received only a fraction of the dollars due to the operation of two independent bus services in our community.

The $2 million+ we fail to receive because of dual services will likely be exacerbated by budget cuts going proposed in the Indiana State Legislature.  Currently, the Indiana Legislature and Governor Daniels would cut support for alternative transportation by 15% — and this is compounded because federal dollars are tied to state support.

In the current budgetary climate, how can we best ensure Bloomington-based bus services can remain vibrant, effective, and efficient?  The logical step is a merger that finds efficiencies, effectiveness, and improved services for our entire community.

2)      To this end, what are the concrete actions you will take during your term, if elected?

It all starts with getting the involved parties to the table to discuss the possibilities of a merger.  Recently, the merger was said to be dead – but the funding situation should motivate IU and the City of Bloomington to initiate the conversation again.

And honestly, I hope my concrete actions will be focused elsewhere – because the conversation between IU and Bloomington should restart this summer (well before the general election in November).  If discussions haven’t started, I would begin working with City Council colleagues and the Mayor’s Office to formulate a strategy that incents Bloomington Transit and IU Bus Service to initiate the discussions.

3)      Do you think Bloomington should actively encourage the bus merger, and if so, what would you do to move it forward?  See above.

4)      How do we accelerate implementation of alternative transportation projects that have been proposed, but not moved forward?

The key will always be budgeting priorities and the availability of funds.  With local government under assault from state and federal levels, the competition for grant dollars supporting alternative transportation will be steep.  Bloomington must always look for creative funding streams to make any infrastructure improvements possible.

5)      What’s the next step to encourage bicycle use on a daily basis?

The next step is increasing the overall connectivity of bike paths/lanes throughout Bloomington & Monroe County – but in a way that creates clear improvement in bike/pedestrian safety  If the average Bloomingtonian doesn’t feel safe on the bike, they will not ride..

6)      What mode(s) of transportation do you use for your daily or weekly routine?  How often do you use modes other than a car?

My primary mode of transportation has been my car – as my wife and I lived in The Stands and where we were raising our two children over the past 12 years.  As you know, the connection of southeast Bloomington with Bike trails and safe cyclist roadways is nonexistent (another priority is to increase that connectivity).   In January we moved to the Bryan Park Neighborhood and are downsizing our lives now that we are “empty nesters.”  This includes increasing the frequency of walking to work and into town.

Posted in Common Council District 5, Fall candidates | Leave a comment

Gary Charbonneau – Democrat for District 3

Answers to B-Top Voter Guide Survey

Gary Charbonneau

Candidate for Bloomington City Council, District 3

1. What do you think is the most important transportation change Bloomington/Ellettsville can make over the coming decade?  Why?

The most important change is to continue to make the policy transition from “making it easier to getting around by automobile (which has been our modus operandi for generations), to “making it easier to get around without an automobile.”  This will require action on several fronts, not just one.

Global production of conventional petroleum has been on a plateau since about 2005.  I do not think that it can remain on that plateau for very much longer.  In fact, I think it is more likely than not that production will begin to decline before the end of the upcoming Bloomington City Council term in 2015.  The decline rate thereafter could, I think, average something like 2% per year.  I won’t venture to speculate on what will happen to the price of gasoline at that point, except to say (1) that it will fluctuate wildly, and (2) as long as we remain in a free market for oil products, at any given time it will be high enough to prevent outright shortages.   All this will have an inevitable impact on the amount of automobile traffic in Bloomington.

There is no doubt in my mind that most people will cling to the comfort and convenience of driving for as long as they can (by, for example, purchasing more fuel efficient vehicles or vehicles running on alternative fuels).  Nevertheless, I would not be surprised to see the beginning of a decline in per capita miles driven in Monroe County on the order of about 1% per year (i.e., about half the decline rate in global oil production).  Such a decline is even more likely if the macroeconomic environment remains poor or deteriorates further, something else I think is not unlikely.  What this means is that I would expect to see Bloomington’s traffic problems slowly begin to disappear as there are fewer cars on the street at any one time.  I would also expect that some people who now drive, especially those on the lowest rung of the economic ladder, will be forced to give up their cars altogether.  This means that our parking problems could slowly begin to disappear as well.

2. To this end, what are the concrete actions you will take during you term, if elected?

My campaign emphasizes a number of issues related to transportation.

First and foremost, I would like to see a significant improvement in the sidewalk infrastructure in my district.  Many neighborhoods in the district were obviously developed without any requirement for putting in sidewalks.  As result, in many places it is very difficult to walk anywhere without having to walk in the street at least part of the time.  Even if everyone doesn’t buy the argument that we are going to be forced to move gradually away from the automobile because of scarce and high-priced fuel, I would hope that we could at least develop a consensus that a build-out of sidewalks is necessary to avoid a safety hazard.  My policy would not be to try to force sidewalks on neighborhoods that don’t want them, but to give priority to the neighborhoods that do.  There is no practical likelihood of the City having the funds to install sidewalks in all the places where they don’t exist anyway, except over a period of many years.

Second, I am in favor of continuing to move forward towards making Bloomington a bicycle-friendly city, and in particular towards increasing the number of bicycle corridors across town.

Third, I would like to see Bloomington Transit investigate the possibility of using buses powered by natural gas instead of diesel fuel.  Natural gas buses are widely used in other cities, and this is a well-established technology.  The reason I suggest this is because I think that natural gas will probably be a significantly cheaper fuel than diesel fuel for many years, so this option could be more economical in the long run.  However, I fully understand that this would require a significant capital investment up front in a natural gas fueling facility, although that could serve City vehicles as well as BT.  In addition, natural gas buses could presumably only be phased in gradually as part of the regular fleet replacement cycle.  Over the very long run, the City could produce its own methane to power the buses (natural gas is basically methane) if it had a properly-designed local landfill, which it currently does not.  Otherwise landfill methane is not just a wasted resource, it’s a significant global environmental hazard because methane is a far more potent greenhouse gas than CO2.  I think that keeping the bus fleet running with locally-produced methane would be a more feasible option than trying to keep it running with locally-produced biodiesel.

3. For several years, a proposal to consolidate Bloomington Transit (BT) and IU Campus Bus has been discussed in our community.  This move has the potential to bring additional funding on the order of approximately $2 million per year to our community for transit.  Do you think Bloomington should actively encourage the bus merger, and if so, what would you do to move it forward?

Should Bloomington actively encourage the merger?  Certainly – an additional $2 million in funding is nothing to sneeze at.  What would I do to move it forward?  I wish I had a good answer to that.  I have the sense that the reason why a merger hasn’t already occurred is not because BT has been unwilling, but because IU has been unwilling.  The merger is not going to occur unless and until IU is on board with it.  I don’t pretend to know what steps, if any, the City can take to bring them on board.

4. How can we accelerate implementation of alternate transportation projects that have been proposed, but not moved forward?

Well, it’s going to take money, and the money has to come from somewhere.  We not only need to reconsider our local priorities, but we need to press forward vigorously in trying to obtain additional funding from state and federal sources.  In the latter regard we are hindered by the fact that the present state government is clearly committed to the old paradigm of building more and more roads to support more and more cars, refusing to recognize that this is a paradigm that has become obsolete.  I did a back-of-the-envelope calculation and determined that the money now being spent on the SR 45/46 Bypass widening project might have paid for something like 144 blocks of sidewalks (both sides), or 288 blocks of sidewalks (one side).

5. What’s the next step to encourage bicycle use on a daily basis?

I think that the most significant thing that can be done is to improve safety by separating automobile and bicycle traffic as much as possible.  This will require more side paths and dedicated bicycle corridors, and even then there will be problems at intersections without grade separation that could be prohibitively expensive to install.  There also needs to be greater recognition that bicycles need parking facilities too.

6. What mode(s) of transportation do you use for your daily or weekly routine?  How often do you use modes other than a car?

I generally drive.  As I said in response to Question 1, most people will cling to the convenience and comfort of the automobile as long as they can, and so far I include myself among “most people.”  I feel quite fortunate, however, in having a place of residence where my daily commute to work is only about 2.5 miles each way.  I drive a car rated at 26 mpg city.  There are usually two of us in the car on the commute, so that trip usually gets about 50 passenger miles per gallon.  For whatever it’s worth, that’s actually much better than Bloomington Transit’s average, which I believe is no more than 30 passenger miles per gallon.

I would definitely like to walk more, but the current absence of sidewalks in my neighborhood forces me, as a pedestrian, to be an intruder into the world of the automobile whenever I do.

Posted in Common Council District 3 | Leave a comment

Susan Sandberg – Democrat for Council At Large

B-TOP Candidate Guide – Susan Sandberg, Councilmember At-Large, Council President 2011

1.        What do you think is the most important transportation change Bloomington/Ellettsville can make over the coming decade and why?

I would promote additional public transportation options connecting Bloomington with popular destinations and institutions outside of the City borders such as Ivy Tech.  That said, I will continue to prioritize urban densities in the development of new business ventures, amenities, and housing in order to contain the public transportation systems to where the majority of citizens reside and work.  Connecting Bloomington with other cities such as Indianapolis, Louisville and Chicago through the State investment in light rail will also be a desired goal for Bloomington leaders to encourage.  This is important in order to connect residents with broader urban opportunities with less reliance on their cars for leisure and cultural activities and business commuting.  I am extremely concerned about the needs of low-income citizens who require public transportation to get and maintain employment.  For these vulnerable individuals, I will advocate for longer bus operation hours and more convenient routes to ensure that those who cannot afford cars have the public support systems they need to make a living wage and manage their personal lives in a more convenient and affordable manner.  In providing supports for low-income riders, of course, all residents of Bloomington who do not wish to rely on cars will have increased public transportation options as well.  Those with fewer means require our utmost efforts in enhancing public transportation options.  All efforts to increase and improve must also be contained within the realistic fiscal affordability of such expansions.

2.        To this end, what are the concrete actions you will take during your term, if elected?

As members of the City Council we must all maintain a reasonable balance in all basic city services that consider the differing needs of low-income individuals, the elderly, children, the disabled, other vulnerable populations, and those transporting goods and passengers.  We must determine the priorities of basic services through a transparent process with broad public input regarding all legislative initiatives.  Those basic services include rate analysis and protections of our water utilities, public safety, infrastructure development and maintenance, land use and green space preservation, trash pick-up and recycling, the health and safety of our core neighborhoods, and intelligent transportation systems that meet current and future needs.  We are mindful of public opinion and contemporary trends in considering all of these services and amenities for Bloomington citizens.  As reducing the carbon footprint is an important ingredient in redefining prosperity, I will continue to support and promote a responsible and comprehensive range of transportation options to encourage biking, walking, public transports and auto travel that is reasonable and responsible.

3. For several years, a proposal to consolidate Bloomington Transit (BT) and IU Campus Bus has been discussed in our community.  This move has the potential to bring additional funding on the order of approximately $2 million per year to our community for transit.  Do you think Bloomington should actively encourage the bus merger, and if so, what would you do to move it forward?

I support a BT/IU bus system merger.  I have been keenly aware of these discussions since the beginning of my time on the Bloomington City Council, and I am also aware of the political challenges that are often beyond the immediate reach of local legislatures.  We are informed that there is a finite amount of transportation funding for the entire State of Indiana.  A BT/IU merger, while increasing dollars to support our bus transportation initiatives that would certainly benefit Bloomington riders, would also come at the expense of other transportation systems throughout the State.  Our gain, their loss equals a political issue to negotiate.  As we continue to make the case for additional funding for our combined systems, we must also be mindful of who governs the Statehouse and where their funding priorities lie.  To the limited extent that I have to change the face of elected officials in other parts of the Hoosier State, I will certainly do that with energy and passion.  We need a new, progressive Governor who values public transportation funding, and the majorities in the House and Senate of our General Assembly are currently not progressive allies with Bloomington in reaching this goal.  All cities and towns deserve adequate public funding in order to have the best possible public transportation systems.  Toward that end as a city official, I will continue to advocate on behalf of Bloomington.  We have limited political influence in the State of Indiana on the whole.  Bloomington is not an isolated island, and as with all things political we must work together, collaboratively and respectfully, to move meaningful public policy change forward.  That requires a good deal of diplomacy, tenacity  and patience, and when it comes to working toward the best possible outcomes for Bloomington, I utilize all of these important qualities as an elected official.  The art of persuasion is a skill that requires listening to everyone, analyzing the challenges and sticking points and negotiating in good faith.  That I can do!

4.       How can we accelerate implementation of alternative transportation projects that have been proposed, but not moved forward?

Again, with respect to my previous answers, the Bloomington City Council works in a methodical and financially prudent manner, and not all good things are produced with immediate speed or dispatch when there are multiple public needs to consider and services to deliver.  Plans are made with respect to possibilities, potential, and the collective political will of the community.  Planning is an important function for city staff, the administration, Plan and Zoning Commissions, and of course, City Council.  With respect to execution of plans, there are due processes to work through, funding options to consider, and public opinion to consider in moving any initiative forward.  Those of us who consider our important work to be multi-faceted in planning for today as well as the future take a measured approach to all forms of transportation, to public need and opinion, and to our fiscal ability to make things happen.  While the speed of government may not move fast enough for some, I’ve learned in my time on council that the best legislation with the most lasting result is crafted thoughtfully, methodically, and with solid analysis of both intended and unintended consequences.  I would respectfully differ with the premise of this question and assert that plans for alternative transportation are moving forward in a methodical and fiscally prudent manner.  In my next term I would continue to support measures to expand transportation options in a deliberate and responsible time frame.

5. What’s the next step to encourage bicycle use on a daily basis?

I support the ongoing bicycle and pedestrian funding initiatives that will move us toward platinum rating.  Next steps are continually developing and unfolding with greater public awareness of the health and environmental benefits of riding and walking, and increasing amenities such as additional bike racks, more connected bike trails, public safety campaigns related to bike/pedestrian/car interactions, and other important measures to encourage increased ridership.  The City of Bloomington has made a major commitment to increasing ridership through the Platinum Bicycle Task Force and our ambitious goals to become a top-rated bicycle friendly city.  I strongly support these efforts and am confident we will see them develop methodically and incrementally over the coming months and years and beyond my time on the Council.  While I wholeheartedly support these efforts, I remain constantly mindful of the many Bloomington residents who, for a variety of reasons, are unable to use bicycles for their daily commutes and personal travel.  With all due respect for these individuals who require climate-controlled and convenient modes of transportation, we must also maintain a diverse continuum of energy efficient transportation options to meet the needs of all Bloomington travelers.  It’s all about balance and accommodation of a wide range of community need!

6. What mode(s) of transportation do you use for your daily or weekly routine?  How often do you use modes other than a car?

I travel almost exclusively by car.  My work schedule is extremely hectic going from early morning into the night on most days. My house in Matlock Heights is not conveniently located near public transit.  I rarely have personal time to exercise, but when I can grab a few private moments for myself I walk in my neighborhood.

Posted in Common Council At Large, Fall candidates | Leave a comment

Mark Kruzan – Democrat for Mayor

Primary winner

[1.      What do you think is the most important transportation change Bloomington/Ellettsville can make over the coming decade?  Why?

2.      To this end, what are the concrete actions you will take during your term, if elected?

3.      For several years, a proposal to consolidate Bloomington Transit (BT) and IU Campus Bus has been discussed in our community.  This move has the potential to bring additional funding on the order of approximately $2 million per year to our community for transit.  Do you think Bloomington should actively encourage the bus merger, and if so, what would you do to move it forward?

4.      How can we accelerate implementation of alternative transportation projects that have been proposed, but not moved forward?

5.      What’s the next step to encourage bicycle use on a daily basis?

6.      What mode(s) of transportation do you use for your daily or weekly routine?  How often do you use modes other than a car?]

Q1. Preparing for a post-oil economy.  The Peak Oil Task Force’s “Redefining Prosperity” report identifies the key issue by stating, “Of all sectors of the US Economy, transportation is the most petroleum-dependent and the most vulnerable to disruption resulting from declining world petroleum supplies.  Ninety-seven percent of transportation energy is reliant on fossil fuel.”

Our local transportation strategy must include emphasis on “obvious” transportation alternatives such as bicycle-pedestrian infrastructure and public transit services.  But we also have to plan and zone in manners that reduce the frequency and length of travel for live/work purposes.  Ten years and beyond, as the question asks, we must also be continuing to work with state and federal governments on passenger rail.  I was able to get Bloomington included in state legislation that directed the State of Indiana to study passenger rail service in and around Indianapolis.  We’ll have to stay in that mix as well as in federal rail planning.

Q2. We have already adopted a Complete Streets Policy and will continue to work to fully implement plans it calls for to ensure that all modes of transportation including biking and walking are included in transportation corridor development.

The League of American Bicyclists last year recognized Bloomington as a Silver-ranked Bicycle-Friendly Community.  That was the first improvement to our designation since 2003.  Our goal, though, is to achieve a Platinum Level designation.  The Platinum Bicycle Task Force created by city government will be implementing numerous transportation-related improvements that will make ours an even more sustainable community.  Those strategies include more bike lanes, bicycle boulevards, connector paths, and sidewalks and sidepaths.  I just announced a $1.5-2 million package to implement those initiatives.  See below for details.

An effective, integrated transportation system considers development patterns in addition to accommodating bike & ped, transit and vehicles.  The guiding principles are diversity, efficiency, and accessibility.

We’ve already made substantial strides in Development Patterns.  There has been a significant increase in Downtown residential density with the addition of 1,500 beds since 2002 and 700 more planned.  We’ve also established responsible development elsewhere in the urban core that revives downtown neighborhoods, supports downtown businesses, reduces demand for vehicular transit and increases bike and ped traffic.

We have made and will make revisions to the UDO to further encourage dense, mixed use development.  Specifically, the Growth Policies Plan will be revised to strengthen and refine responsible and sustainable development requirements.  Those revisions will include “activity nodes” (aka neighborhood centers) in suburban areas, considering ways to make bike and ped travel feasible in all areas of the city.

Bloomington Transit has made regular and dramatic ridership increases, from 2 million to 3 million passengers since I was first elected mayor.  We are continuing to support BT, most recently by keeping the BT hub in the downtown as opposed to the outskirts of the city where land is less expensive.  The hope is to merge bus systems (See next question), but whether that happens or not, we will work with IU to integrate technology into the system with kiosks, smart phone applications, transit appliances, and integration with Google maps, etc.

I go into more detail on alternative transportation below, but let me say now that we will increase the number of miles of bike lanes, commit more TIP dollars to bike and ped-specific projects, and update the Long Range Transportation Plan using a multi-modal traffic demand model.

We are also going to form an internal, joint departmental committee consisting of representatives from Public Works, Planning, Parks, Economic & Sustainable Development, Office of the Mayor, Utilities, IT, HR, Council and others to ensure bike and ped projects are given equal weight in the capital projects selection process.

We will increase coordination with IU on future bike developments and planning; work with the university to expand car-sharing program downtown; and work with BPD, the Bloomington Bicycle Club and others to develop an enforcement plan targeting cycling-related issues.

Q3. City government and Bloomington Transit (two distinct entities) have both aggressively pursued a merger with IU’s bus system.  There are two issues that need to be considered.  First, IU wants to maintain more management authority than makes sense in a truly merged system.  It’s also an important issue because State and Federal transportation officials will demand a system that is merged in more than just name.

Second, the additional $2 million is frequently sited as a justification for merging.  That dollar amount has taken on a life of its own, but it is an uncertain figure.  More importantly, it is highly likely that any initial funding increase will be quickly followed by a redistribution of dollars by the state legislature.  Other communities will not idly allow more money to flow to another community.  A new distribution formula could, and likely would, negate any temporary gain.  The motivation for merger must be efficiencies and service improvement and, unfortunately, not new dollars.

Q4. Many alternative transportation projects have already moved forward.  In fact, city government has allocated more dollars for alternative transportation in recent years than at any time in history.

• The number of miles of bike routes has increased from 11 to 40.

• Bike lane miles increased from 8 to 13.

• Trails and sidepath miles are up from 15 to 25.

• Total alternative system miles are up from 44 to 78.

I recently announced even more investment on this front in the form of a significant bike and ped funding initiative to address the mobility needs of bicyclists and pedestrians in the community.

The initiatives are ultimately designed to elevate Bloomington’s status as a bicycle friendly community. In October 2010, Bloomington received a Silver level Bicycle Friendly Community designation from the League of American Bicyclists. This designation upgraded Bloomington’s Bronze rating, which was awarded in 2003. Bloomington’s goal, as officially outlined in a City Council resolution adopted on May 12, 2010, is to elevate the community’s bicycle friendly designation to the highest status, Platinum, by 2016. Only three cities in the United States have attained Platinum designation – Portland, OR; Davis, CA; and Boulder, CO.

My initiative is directed to one goal — making investments that will elevate our status as a Bicycle Friendly Community and keep our city sustainable and viable for future generations.

Specifically, the City is proposing an aggressive implementation plan to fund the following projects:

A. Greenways Implementation Plan - This analysis will make specific recommendations concerning what bicycle facilities should be constructed on key street corridors identified for such facilities in the City’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation and Greenways System Plan.

The results of this analysis will allow the City to install facilities such as bike lanes, shared road markings (sharrows), and bicycle boulevards to carry out the recommendations of the Plan.

B. Installation of Bicycle Facilities as recommended by the Greenways Implementation Plan - Once the implementation plan has been completed, the City will start installing recommended bicycle facilities such as bike lanes, sharrows, and bicycle boulevard improvements.  Improvements such as striping and signage will be funded by the Public Works Department.  More substantial capital improvements such as bicycle and pedestrian crossings along high traffic streets may require federal funding assistance.

Those first two are a holistic, community-wide approach to promoting bicycling and pedestrian transportation in Bloomington.  The next two are very significant and also related.  Every time I reference the B-Line Trail, I note how important it is in and of itself.  But I also always reference that I view the B-Line as the backbone of a wider trail system. It will be a 3.1 mile trail that connects into other trails north and south.  Collectively, there will be more than 7 miles of connected trail.  I’ve also, though, announced plans to begin to branch out to the east and west.  Most significantly, we’re going to connect Bryan Park — and beyond — to the B-Line.  That takes me to the following initiatives.

C. Allen Street Bicycle Boulevard – The Allen Street corridor is identified in the City’s Greenways Plan as a highly desirable biking route connecting west and east side neighborhoods to such destinations as the B-Line Trail, Bryan Park, and the City’s future park on the McDoel Switchyard property.

I’m proposing an aggressive schedule to construct a bicycle boulevard along this corridor running from Patterson Drive to the west to College Mall Road to the east.  Phase I will be constructed this year and run from Bryan Park to South Walnut Street.  Additionally, the City proposes to seek Tax Increment Finance District funding this year to design and construct the boulevard from Walnut Street west to the B-Line Trail, through the McDoel Gardens neighborhood to Patterson Drive as well as east through Bryan Park, and further east to College Mall Road.  This portion of the boulevard would start construction in 2012.

D. Black Lumber Spur Trail Construction - In addition to providing an on-street biking corridor to the B-Line Trail, the City also proposes to create a key bicycle and pedestrian linkage to the B-Line by purchasing and constructing a trail along this abandoned railroad spur.  The spur runs from South Henderson Street, along the north side of the Black Lumber property, and eventually terminates into the City’s recently acquired Switchyard property.  The City proposes to construct this project in 2014/2015 using 80% federal funding.

E. Implementation of College Mall Pedestrian Accessibility Study - Increasing the safety and comfort of pedestrians who are using the College Mall, Eastland Plaza, and Jackson Creek Shopping areas is another important City goal.  To that end, the City Planning Department worked closely with the Bicycle & Pedestrian Safety Commission to complete a pedestrian accessibility study of this area in 2010.  The City proposes to use a combination of federal and local money in 2014 to design and implement improvements recommended in this study, including handicapped ramps, sidewalk construction, transit shelters, crosswalks, and pedestrian signalization.

We are very excited to propose this new and progressive package of bicycle and pedestrian projects in addition to all the other commitments we’ve made over the last 7 years to create a balanced transportation plan for Bloomington.  If we’re going to achieve our shared goal of elevating our Bicycle Friendly Community designation by 2016, these are the kinds of investments we have to be considering now.  We look forward to working with the City Council’s Platinum Task Force later this year to propose even more initiatives.

Q5. Providing safe routes.  Improving connectivity of existing bikeways.  Continuing to promote bicycle safety courses as well as safety equipment distribution programs.  Enforcement of vehicular and cycling ordinances and laws.  Build upon our already strong bicycle parking program, which involves bike rack installation throughout the city and converting parking spaces on-street and in parking garages for cyclist use.  Aggressive public awareness and education programming.  Ordinances such as “No Right Turn On Red” and reduced speed limits have already been implemented and will continue.  Bicycle Boulevards will be built — and will link important destinations throughout the city including shopping, employment, and recreation centers.  As an employer, we reward employees who frequently ride to work as a part of our benefit package.  We’re also making space available to the Bike Project for its good works.

Q6. I drive a union-made, hybrid vehicle.  I set meetings within walking distance of City Hall that allow me to support locally owned Downtown establishments!

Posted in Bloomington Mayor, Fall candidates | Leave a comment

Greg Alexander – Democrat for District 1

[1.      What do you think is the most important transportation change Bloomington/Ellettsville can make over the coming decade?  Why?

2.      To this end, what are the concrete actions you will take during your term, if elected?

3.      For several years, a proposal to consolidate Bloomington Transit (BT) and IU Campus Bus has been discussed in our community.  This move has the potential to bring additional funding on the order of approximately $2 million per year to our community for transit.  Do you think Bloomington should actively encourage the bus merger, and if so, what would you do to move it forward?

4.      How can we accelerate implementation of alternative transportation projects that have been proposed, but not moved forward?

5.      What’s the next step to encourage bicycle use on a daily basis?

6.      What mode(s) of transportation do you use for your daily or weekly routine?  How often do you use modes other than a car?]

Greg thinks…

1. We need to think of our roads as places, rather than as conduits.  We should start with low-hanging fruit, such as the College/Walnut corridor.  It is already packed with destinations, but large parts of the roadway are designed to further the illusion that you may enter the conduit at Winslow Road and then magically pop out in Ellettsville, without interacting with any of the land in between.  To this end, College&Walnut should become two-way streets, with a consistent 10-foot lane width.  Traffic will move smoothy, but slowly.  This is called a road diet.

2. I want to reform the Department of Public Works so that whenever they consider a road project — ANY road project — they will consider pedestrians (“complete streets”).  This means that when they look at a place like 17th street, they will consider installing sidewalks along the entire corridor before they will invest millions of dollars improving driver convenience at a single intersection.

3. It has been suggested that the Indiana Transportation Association (ITA is a state-wide organization of transit corporations) would oppose any move by Bloomington to get a larger piece of the pie than we currently have.  At a minimum, we need to remove the executive director of the ITA from the Bloomington Transit Board, as this is a tremendous conflict of interest!

4. Alternative transportation projects are lying stagnant because the Department of Public Works views their mission statement as the efficient movement of high-speed automobile traffic.  If they re-target, they will find lots of opportunity to cut down overdesigned intersections to make money available for human-scale development.

5. Safety is the #1 complaint among cyclists.  If a human body is hit by a car moving at 20mph, there is about 10% chance of a fatality.  At 40mph, that increases to 90%!  We need to do everything we can to limit traffic on city streets to a maximum of 25mph in practice.

6. I have never had a car or a driver’s license.  I bike most of the time, but I have been known to walk.  I miss NYC, where I would ride the subway.

Posted in Common Council District 1 | Leave a comment

Andy Ruff – Democrat for Council At Large

[1.      What do you think is the most important transportation change Bloomington/Ellettsville can make over the coming decade?  Why?

2.      To this end, what are the concrete actions you will take during your term, if elected?

3.      For several years, a proposal to consolidate Bloomington Transit (BT) and IU Campus Bus has been discussed in our community.  This move has the potential to bring additional funding on the order of approximately $2 million per year to our community for transit.  Do you think Bloomington should actively encourage the bus merger, and if so, what would you do to move it forward?

4.      How can we accelerate implementation of alternative transportation projects that have been proposed, but not moved forward?

5.      What’s the next step to encourage bicycle use on a daily basis?

6.      What mode(s) of transportation do you use for your daily or weekly routine?  How often do you use modes other than a car?]

1.  Start spending transportation $ on community friendly, planet friendly, sustainable transportation options like transit, bicycling, and walking, and stop spending money on car and truck capacity enhancement projects that are always doubly-negative because they encourage car use at the same time they discourage other forms of transportation (transit, biking, walking) that are far more consistent with our stated community goals and policies.

2.  I will continue to lead by example, using a bicycle as my primary mode of transportation.  I will work to be sure we have people on our Transit Board, Traffic Commission, and other relevant appointed bodies, that have a transportation perspective that is consistent with stated community goals and policies as I describe in my answer to question #1.  I will not cast votes that promote car use and make the bike and ped environment more hostile.  I will continue to push the Mayor and the MPO to stop building car capacity-increasing projects and instead invest far more in transit, biking and pedestrian projects.  I will also continue to push for the kind of built environment (density, mixed use, etc.) that promotes transit and biking and walking.

3.   Assuming that the $2million is a strong possibility, then certainly yes.  That said, I would want to know more about possible downsides if we don’t end up getting more funding (for example maybe a less responsive, larger, merged system).  I would work with the Mayor, Transit Board, IU, MPO, and the City Council to make it happen.

4.   By working on two fronts – the first being to educate and mobilize to vote for and demand more investment in non-car and truck transportation, and the other being to get the projects into the TIP, if they are in the LRTP, and if they aren’t then get them in the LRTP then get them there and then into the TIP.

5.   Stop building for the car.  Reduce parking subsidies.  Stop requiring parking.  Provide more bike amenities and infrastructure of the kind that meets commuting needs rather than recreational.

6.   Bike, car, walk.  90% of my trips are by bike.  The rest are car and walking.

Posted in Common Council At Large, Fall candidates | Leave a comment

Dorothy Granger – Democrat for District 2

[Unopposed in primary]

DOROTHY GRANGER, Democrat for District 2 City Council

Response to B-TOP Transportation Questionnaire

1.    Most important transportation change Bloomington/Ellettsville can make over coming decade?

I can’t speak for Ellettsville but transportation in general could be made more “public” and accessible to potential riders.  I think, in the minds of many, public transportation is only for people who don’t have cars.  One challenge will be to help people move away from our auto-centric thinking and see the benefits of shared riding – personal and environmental.  This is particularly challenging when the population is spread across the county… as are services.

2.    Concrete actions I can take during my term?

It really isn’t feasible to legislate people to use alternate means of transportation but we can educate.  Education is key to getting people “on board” with alternate means of transportation and I would support public meetings where people can learn from those with more experience.    I would urge the continuation of plans already in place for walk paths and biking paths as well as work with the neighborhood associations in my district to ensure their needs are being met regarding their transportation concerns.  It is important to acknowledge that not everyone is ambulatory due to age or diminished capacity, but making healthy choices is part of changing the way we look at transportation issues.

3.    Should proposal to consolidate Bloomington Transit and Campus Bus Service be encouraged and how would I move it forward?

This proposal seems reasonable on the surface, but I am not yet privy to the details of the proposal so can’t say with any authority exactly what I would do.  I do support the consolidation if indeed it would save the city and taxpayers money and meet the needs of the riders.

4.    How to accelerate implementation of alternative transportation projects that have been proposed but not moved forward?

If you are talking about projects that have been proposed and approved, have funds been allocated?  This seems to me to be the first step in moving them forward.  From what I have researched, projects such as these do require considerable funding and as such, may not all happen at once but be spread out over time to ensure adequate funding.  Many projects will come before Council during the budgeting process and I will attend to all requests.  I can’t say that one project will necessarily take precedence over another; what are the city and taxpayer priorities?  I am looking forward to being an active and engaged participant in the city’s planning process that is up for review in 2012.

5.    Next step to encourage daily bicycle use?

I think one way to encourage bicycle use is to ensure safe routes for bikers.  This involves citizen participation and city planning.  In addition, being involved with community-wide initiatives such as the ACHIEVE program co-sponsored by the YMCA, Bloomington Hospital and other groups is a way to again, educate people about the importance of living healthy and providing tips and support to do so – bicycling being one “healthy choice.”

 

6.    My personal modes of transportation?

I seldom use other modes of transportation other than my personal automobile.  I usually drive and park in the convention center commuter lot and walk to my various meetings and the business to which I have to attend.  During winter months I often utilize the bus system and my daughter does so on a regular basis.  During summer months I often ride my bicycle but do not use this as a regular means of transporting myself from point A to point B as I do not feel myself to be a stable rider.

Posted in Common Council District 2, Fall candidates | Leave a comment